<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peering behind the curtain of advocacy email campaigns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beaconfire.com/blog/2011/01/peering-behind-the-curtain-of-advocacy-email-campaigns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beaconfire.com/blog/2011/01/peering-behind-the-curtain-of-advocacy-email-campaigns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:11:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kondratick</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconfire.com/blog/2011/01/peering-behind-the-curtain-of-advocacy-email-campaigns/comment-page-1/#comment-41869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kondratick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beaconfire.com/blog/?p=2613#comment-41869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post, Rob. The question on orgs. identifying themselves in their campaigns, to me, is key. I work w/an organization that focuses on running campaigns that promote personal interaction between our advocates and Members, and we actually go to great lengths to ID our org as the one that prompts the meetings.

Once our advocates are able to establish their stories face-to-face, continuing the association w/our org thru electronic correspondence only strengthens the relationship with Member moving forward and allows us to have a greater impact, even though our overall volume of electronic communications won&#039;t be as large as other orgs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Rob. The question on orgs. identifying themselves in their campaigns, to me, is key. I work w/an organization that focuses on running campaigns that promote personal interaction between our advocates and Members, and we actually go to great lengths to ID our org as the one that prompts the meetings.</p>
<p>Once our advocates are able to establish their stories face-to-face, continuing the association w/our org thru electronic correspondence only strengthens the relationship with Member moving forward and allows us to have a greater impact, even though our overall volume of electronic communications won&#8217;t be as large as other orgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Peering behind the curtain of advocacy email campaigns &#124; Beaconfire Wire -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconfire.com/blog/2011/01/peering-behind-the-curtain-of-advocacy-email-campaigns/comment-page-1/#comment-41257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Peering behind the curtain of advocacy email campaigns &#124; Beaconfire Wire -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beaconfire.com/blog/?p=2613#comment-41257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rob Pierson, Sam Gregory and Jake Brewer, Beaconfire. Beaconfire said: Former staffer gives insider&#039;s account of what Congressional offices think about campaign form letters: http://bit.ly/hWTGoB [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rob Pierson, Sam Gregory and Jake Brewer, Beaconfire. Beaconfire said: Former staffer gives insider&#039;s account of what Congressional offices think about campaign form letters: <a href="http://bit.ly/hWTGoB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hWTGoB</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
